JAGTAR KAUR . vs STATE OF PUNJAB . — SLP(C) No. 15535 - 15536/2013
Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010120612013
Filing Date
13-Apr-2013
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 15535 - 15536/2013
Diary Number
12061/2013
Order Date
22-Jan-2019
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAGTAR KAUR .
Adv. ASHOK K. MAHAJAN[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB .
Adv. SUSHMA SURI[R-1] CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI[R-1] UTTARA BABBAR (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Jan-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jan-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta
-
19-Nov-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2018
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde and Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao
-
24-Jul-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jul-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Mar-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Apr-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Apr-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Apr-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Apr-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-May-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jan-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Nov-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-May-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Apr-2013
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 15535 - 15536/2013
Case Summary: Jagtar Kaur v. State of Punjab Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions challenging the High Court's Division Bench judgment dated 21-03-2013. However, invoking Article 142 of the Constitution, the Court directed that amounts already paid to petitioners (retiral benefits) would not be recovered by the State, applicable to both retired petitioners and serving employees who received such amounts under the Single Judge's orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts