VIKRANT SINGH vs STATE OF A.P. — SLP(Crl) No. 2882/2012

Case under Section II. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010119712012

Filing Date

07-Apr-2012

Registration No

SLP(Crl) No. 2882/2012

Diary Number

11971/2012

Order Date

04-Mar-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIKRANT SINGH

    Adv. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF A.P.

    Adv. D. MAHESH BABU SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR[Caveat] SRIDHAR POTARAJU (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 25-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 09-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 12-Dec-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 30-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 14-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 12-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 15-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 14-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 23-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 19-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 28-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 27-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 17-Aug-2012
  16. 23-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 04-May-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 17-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 07-Apr-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(Crl) No. 2882/2012

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Supreme Court dismissed Vikrant Singh's Special Leave to Appeal challenging the High Court's March 22, 2012 order. However, the Court reserved liberty for petitioner to file discharge applications under Section 239 CrPC before the Trial Court if charged, directing the Trial Court to consider such applications independently without being influenced by High Court observations. The Registry was directed to refund Rs. 46 lacs deposited by petitioner with accrued interest, and all contentions of both parties remain open. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case