NAVNEET PRABHAKAR PACHPOR . vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . — C.A. No. 6645/2015

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010118032013

Filing Date

11-Apr-2013

Registration No

C.A. No. 6645/2015

Diary Number

11803/2013

Order Date

23-Feb-2023

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAVNEET PRABHAKAR PACHPOR .

    Adv. UDAY B. DUBE (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .

    Adv. ARJUN KRISHNAN[R-10] [Pr] ARVIND S. AVHAD[R-3] SHIRISH K. DESHPANDE[R-2] AADITYA ANIRUDDHA PANDE[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Feb-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 23-Feb-2023

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia

  4. 16-May-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 16-May-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Jan-2017
  7. 11-Jan-2017

    Office ReportView PDF

  8. 11-Jan-2017
  9. 06-Dec-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 18-Oct-2016
  11. 18-Oct-2016
  12. 08-Sep-2016
  13. 08-Sep-2016
  14. 23-Aug-2016
  15. 23-Aug-2016
  16. 29-Jun-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  17. 29-Apr-2016
  18. 29-Apr-2016
  19. 07-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 07-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 09-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 09-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 14-Oct-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 18-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 07-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 26-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 11-Apr-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 6645/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Summary On February 23, 2023, the Supreme Court dismissed three consolidated civil appeals filed by Navneet Prabhakar Pachpor against the State of Maharashtra as infructuous, finding that the cause of action no longer survived because the term of Councillors had expired. The Court kept the point of law open for future consideration, disposed of all pending applications, and made no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case