PUNJAB WAKF BOARD ADDL LAW OFFICER vs SHAM SINGH HARIKE — C.A. No. 92/2019
Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010118002011
Filing Date
11-Apr-2011
Registration No
C.A. No. 92/2019
Diary Number
11800/2011
Order Date
07-Feb-2019
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2019 INSC 157
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PUNJAB WAKF BOARD ADDL LAW OFFICER
Adv. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHAM SINGH HARIKE
Adv. SHIBU DEVASIA OLICKAL VINEET BHAGAT[R-1] [Pr]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Feb-2019
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Feb-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Feb-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph
-
04-Jan-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jan-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-May-2012
ROPView PDF
-
13-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Apr-2012
ROPView PDF
-
12-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Feb-2012
ROPView PDF
-
09-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
21-Oct-2011
ROPView PDF
-
11-Apr-2011
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 92/2019
-
[ 2019 INSC 157 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Summary: Punjab Wakf Board v. Sham Singh Harike & Teja Singh (2019) The Supreme Court allowed the Punjab Wakf Board's appeal in the Sham Singh Harike case but dismissed its appeal against Teja Singh. The court clarified that when a defendant challenges whether disputed property is a Wakf property, the Wakf Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction under Sections 6-7 of the Wakf Act 1995, not Civil Courts—rejecting the High Court's view that non-Muslims cannot be bound by Wakf Tribunal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts