KISHORE vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH DISTRICT MAGISTRATE — Crl.A. No. 2116/2009

Case under Section II-E. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010116562008

Filing Date

22-Apr-2008

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 2116/2009

Diary Number

11656/2008

Order Date

25-Apr-2019

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KISHORE

    Adv. PRATIBHA JAIN PRATIBHA JAIN[P-2]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

    Adv. SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Apr-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 25-Apr-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta

  4. 28-Mar-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta

  5. 28-Feb-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta

  6. 21-Feb-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta

  7. 20-Feb-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta

  8. 19-Feb-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta

  9. 14-Feb-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta

  10. 17-Jan-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta

  11. 16-Jan-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta

  12. 15-Jan-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta

  13. 13-Dec-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 13-Dec-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah

  15. 06-Dec-2018

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi

  16. 05-Dec-2018

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi

  17. 29-Nov-2018

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi

  18. 20-Nov-2018

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi

  19. 15-Nov-2018

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi

  20. 14-Nov-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 05-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 17-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 27-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 06-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 11-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 13-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 31-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 02-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 19-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 05-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 15-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 11-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 24-Jun-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 23-Jun-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 22-Apr-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 2116/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Criminal Appeal No. 2116 of 2009 (Kishore v. State of Madhya Pradesh) Kishore and Indersingh were convicted under IPC Section 325 read with Section 34 for assaulting complainant Dhyan Singh on July 5, 2001 with a stone and cycle chain, causing fractures. The trial court and High Court upheld their conviction with two-year rigorous imprisonment and Rs 1,500 fine each. The Supreme Court rejected the appellants' challenge regarding evidentiary inconsistencies but, considering their clean criminal record and underlying revenue disputes with the complainant, released them on one-year probation under CrPC Section 360 instead of imprisonment. The appellants were directed to execute bonds satisfactory to the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case