DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. vs BEVERLY PARK II CONDOMINIUM — C.A. No. 4773/2013

Case under Energy Laws - Electricity, Petroleum, Oil and Natural Gas : Energy Laws - Electricity, Petroleum, Oil and Natural Gas Section XVII. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010116122013

Filing Date

09-Apr-2013

Registration No

C.A. No. 4773/2013

Diary Number

11612/2013

Order Date

21-Oct-2024

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Energy Laws - Electricity, Petroleum, Oil and Natural Gas : Energy laws - Electricity, Petroleum, Oil and Natural Gas Section XVII

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

    Adv. CHANDRA PRAKASH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BEVERLY PARK II CONDOMINIUM

    Adv. S. NARAIN & CO.

Case History

  1. 21-Oct-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  2. 21-Oct-2024

    Mention Memo

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Mehta

  3. 01-Oct-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 20-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 20-Nov-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 20-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 27-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 27-Aug-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 27-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 08-May-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 08-May-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 16-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 02-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 16-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 09-Apr-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 4773/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Civil Appeal No. 4773/2013 between Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigm Ltd. (appellant) and Beverly Park II Condominium (respondent), heard on 21-10-2024 before Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Justice Sandeep Mehta, the Court granted an early hearing application (IA No. 184601/2024) by expediting the hearing. No substantive order on the merits was passed; the record does not disclose the underlying dispute or next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case