THE STATE OF JHARKHAND vs PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH — SLP(Crl) No.(Verified On 8-4-2025)
Case under 1511Misc-criminal Law : Criminal Matters Other Than Covered by the Aforesaid Categories(slps Arising Out of Quashing Applications, Orders Framing Charge, Summoning Orders, Interim Orders in Criminal Matters, Withdrawal of Prosecution, Orders for Further Investigation/re-investigation Etc. Section II-A. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010115632025
Filing Date
02-Mar-2025
Registration No
SLP(Crl) No.(Verified On 8-4-2025)
Diary Number
11563/2025
Order Date
21-May-2026
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed on ground of delay
Data as of 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Adv. JAYANT MOHAN
Respondent(s)
PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH
Adv. VAIBHAV NITI[R-1] VAIBHAV NITI[R-2] VAIBHAV NITI[R-3] VAIBHAV NITI[R-4]
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-May-2026 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 20-Mar-2026 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 13-Feb-2026 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 20-Jan-2026 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 13-Oct-2025 | Fixed Date by Court |
Orders in this case
Case Summary: SLP(Crl) No. 11563/2025 The Supreme Court dismissed the State of Jharkhand's Special Leave Petitions challenging a High Court order concerning allegations that respondent Pankaj Kumar Singh illegally cut trees in protected forest areas despite having permission only for trees on private land. The Court found no interference warranted after reviewing the petitioners' own rejoinder affidavit, which revealed the allegedly cut trees were not removed but remained at the site, with the Government subsequently holding departmental officers responsible and instituting cases against them. The petitions were dismissed on both grounds of inordinate delay in filing and lack of merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts