B.PANKAJAM AND ORS. ETC. vs SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (ADW) AND ORS. ETC. — C.A. No. 7763/2014
Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010113842006
Filing Date
28-Apr-2006
Registration No
C.A. No. 7763/2014
Diary Number
11384/2006
Order Date
05-Oct-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 26-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.B.PANKAJAM AND ORS. ETC.
Adv. GEETHA KOVILAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (ADW) AND ORS. ETC.
Adv. M. A. CHINNASAMY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-Oct-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Oct-2017
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
-
19-Sep-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Sep-2017
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
-
16-Aug-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Aug-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre
-
10-Aug-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Aug-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Mar-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jan-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jan-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Oct-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-May-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jan-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Nov-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Oct-2006
ROPView PDF
-
12-May-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Apr-2006
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 7763/2014
Summary of C.A. No. 007763/2014 (B. Pankajam v. Special Tahsildar) The Supreme Court dismissed B. Pankajam's appeal on October 5, 2017, finding no grounds to interfere with the High Court's judgment. However, the Court clarified that the High Court's finding regarding title would not be binding on any Civil Court proceeding. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts