RANJIT SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB . — Crl.A. No. 1853/2009

Case under Section II-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010113402009

Filing Date

16-Apr-2009

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1853/2009

Diary Number

11340/2009

Order Date

04-Jul-2013

Document Type

Judgment - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RANJIT SINGH

    Adv. RISHI MALHOTRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB .

    Adv. SUDARSHAN SINGH RAWAT KULDIP SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jul-2013

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 04-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 27-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 26-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 21-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 19-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 06-Dec-2012

    ROPView PDF

  9. 08-Nov-2012

    ROPView PDF

  10. 04-Sep-2012

    ROPView PDF

  11. 03-Sep-2012

    ROPView PDF

  12. 21-Aug-2012

    ROPView PDF

  13. 21-Mar-2012

    ROPView PDF

  14. 17-Feb-2012

    ROPView PDF

  15. 11-May-2011

    ROPView PDF

  16. 04-Jan-2010

    ROPView PDF

  17. 16-Dec-2009

    ROPView PDF

  18. 25-Nov-2009

    ROPView PDF

  19. 13-Nov-2009

    ROPView PDF

  20. 23-Oct-2009

    ROPView PDF

  21. 19-Oct-2009

    ROPView PDF

  22. 01-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 21-Aug-2009

    ROPView PDF

  24. 24-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 08-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 16-Apr-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1853/2009

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

The Supreme Court allowed most appeals, acquitting five accused (Makhan Singh, Gurdial Singh, Amrik Singh, Jaswinder Singh, Rajinder Singh) and Shavinderjit Singh of murder and attempt-to-murder charges, finding the prosecution case riddled with exaggerations and embellishments. Only Balwinder Singh's conviction was upheld based on ballistic evidence proving he fired fatal shots; the others lacked direct evidence of carrying firearms or committing specific violent acts beyond mere presence at a land-dispute incident that killed two persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case