ADAM HASANMIYA KAGDI . vs MARIYAMBI UMAR MALBARI — C.A. No. 1622/2012

Case under Land Laws, Agricultural Tenancy, Land Revenue : Abolition of Zamindari/jagirs/inams/estates, Land Reform Legislations, Agricultural Tenancy, Including Prohibition of Transfer of Land Belonging to Sc/st Section III. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010110102011

Filing Date

05-Apr-2011

Registration No

C.A. No. 1622/2012

Diary Number

11010/2011

Order Date

02-Sep-2025

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Laws, Agricultural tenancy, Land Revenue : Abolition of zamindari/jagirs/inams/estates, land reform legislations, agricultural tenancy, including prohibition of transfer of land belonging to SC/ST Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ADAM HASANMIYA KAGDI .

    Adv. SACHIN PATIL[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MARIYAMBI UMAR MALBARI

    Adv. NIRNIMESH DUBE

Case History

  1. 02-Sep-2025

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  2. 02-Sep-2025

    IA

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan

  3. 10-Feb-2025

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 10-Feb-2025

    IA

    Registrar

  5. 16-Dec-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 16-Dec-2024

    IA

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra

  7. 06-Aug-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 06-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 25-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 05-Dec-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 15-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 28-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 29-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 04-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 05-Apr-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1622/2012

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 1622/2012 - Adam Hasanmiya Kagdi v. Mariyambi Umar Malbari On 02-09-2025, the Supreme Court heard three interlocutory applications and allowed all of them. The court granted the appellants' requests to: (1) set aside the abatement of the case, (2) condone the delay in filing the application for setting aside abatement, and (3) substitute the deceased appellant no. 3 with legal representatives. The respondent raised no objection. The court directed that the cause title be amended accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case