M/S J.P.LIGHTS INDIA PROPRIETOR SRI. GERMEN MENEGES vs THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR E.S.I. CORPORATION — C.A. No. 2527/2012

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010109972011

Filing Date

05-Apr-2011

Registration No

C.A. No. 2527/2012

Diary Number

10997/2011

Order Date

27-Jul-2023

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S J.P.LIGHTS INDIA PROPRIETOR SRI. GERMEN MENEGES

    Adv. BALAJI SRINIVASAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR E.S.I. CORPORATION

    Adv. VAIBHAV MANU SRIVASTAVA[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Jul-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 27-Jul-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal

  4. 20-Jul-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 20-Jul-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal

  6. 13-Jul-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 13-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 24-Sep-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 24-Sep-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 22-Jul-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 01-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 21-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 16-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 21-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 05-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 05-Apr-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 2527/2012

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: C.A. No. 002527/2012 The Supreme Court dismissed J.P. Lights India's appeal challenging ESI Corporation's classification of its electrical goods shop as a factory under the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948. The Court held that since the appellant's premises engaged in both selling and servicing electrical goods (a manufacturing/repair process) with more than ten employees using electrical power, it fell squarely within the definition of "factory" and was subject to ESI Act provisions. The appeal was dismissed as meritless on 27 July 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case