DATABIT TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED vs RED FORT CAPITAL FINANCE COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED — SLP(C) No. 18576/2026

Case under Arbitration Law and Other Alternative Dispute Resolution : Challenge to Arbitral Award, Matters Relating to Execution Under Section 36, Under Section 34/Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 and Challenges to Arbitral Award Under Arbitration Act, 1940 Section XIV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010109962026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 18576/2026

Diary Number

10996/2026

Order Date

20-May-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Delay Condoned and matter dismissed(including all pending Ias)

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration Law and Other Alternative Dispute Resolution : Challenge to arbitral award, matters relating to execution under Section 36, under Section 34/Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 and challenges to arbitral award under Arbitration Act, 1940 Section XIV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DATABIT TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED

    Adv. PULKIT AGARWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RED FORT CAPITAL FINANCE COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED

    Adv. HARSH PARASHAR [caveat]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 20-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.V. Viswanathan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vijay Bishnoi

  4. 19-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 19-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 18576/2026

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary In this Special Leave Petition hearing on 20-05-2026, the Supreme Court (Justice K.V. Viswanathan and Justice Vijay Bishnoi) heard arguments from both Databit Technologies Private Limited and Red Fort Capital Finance Company Private Limited regarding a Delhi High Court arbitration order dated 06-01-2026. The Court condoned the delay in filing and dismissed the special leave petition, finding no grounds to interfere with the impugned order; all pending applications were also disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case