STATE OF U.P. . vs BASTI SUGAR MILLS CO.LTD. . — C.A. No. 3915 - 3917/2009
Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010109572008
Filing Date
15-Apr-2008
Registration No
C.A. No. 3915 - 3917/2009
Diary Number
10957/2008
Order Date
01-Nov-2011
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. .
Adv. RAVI PRAKASH MEHROTRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.BASTI SUGAR MILLS CO.LTD. .
Adv. AJAY CHOUDHARY VISHNU SHARMA MANIK KARANJAWALA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-May-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Apr-2009
ROPView PDF
-
11-Nov-2008
ROPView PDF
-
03-Sep-2008
ROPView PDF
-
27-Jun-2008
ROPView PDF
-
15-May-2008
ROPView PDF
-
12-May-2008
ROPView PDF
-
12-May-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-May-2008
ROPView PDF
-
15-Apr-2008
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 3915 - 3917/2009
-
08-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Mar-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jan-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Summary of CA No. 003915-003917/2009 On 1 November 2011, the Supreme Court dismissed Civil Appeals 3915-3917/2009 (State of U.P. v. Basti Sugar Mills Co. Ltd.) as infructuous. The appeals challenged interim orders dated 15 November 2007 and 31 March 2008 from the Allahabad High Court, but became moot following the High Court's final judgments in the underlying writ petitions. Other related matters remained part-heard for further arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts