NAILA FATMI vs STATE OF U.P. — C.A. No. 4592/2025

Case under Housing and Building-municipal Laws-housing and Building Permits, Slums Rehabilitation, Demolition, Encroachment/ Removal of Encroachment, Sealing and Urban Planning : Housing and Building- Matters Relating to Municipal Laws, Housing and Building Permits, Slums Rehabilitation, Demolition, Encroachment/ Removal of Encroachment, Sealing and Urban Planning (Other Than Rera) Section III-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010106652021

Filing Date

17-Apr-2021

Registration No

C.A. No. 4592/2025

Diary Number

10665/2021

Order Date

01-Apr-2025

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Disposed off

Last updated 01-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Housing and Building-Municipal Laws-Housing and building permits, slums rehabilitation, demolition, encroachment/ removal of encroachment, sealing and urban planning : Housing and Building- matters relating to Municipal Laws, housing and building permits, slums rehabilitation, demolition, encroachment/ removal of encroachment, sealing and urban planning (other than RERA) Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAILA FATMI

    Adv. ROOH-E-HINA DUA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P.

    Adv. PARMANAND GAUR[R-2] PARMANAND GAUR[R-3] KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2025

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan

  3. 24-Mar-2025

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan

  4. 21-Mar-2025

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan

  5. 05-Mar-2025

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh

  6. 03-Mar-2025

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan

  7. 01-Dec-2023

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Augustine George Masih

  8. 19-May-2022

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

  9. 31-Mar-2022

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant

  10. 11-Mar-2022

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant

  11. 14-Feb-2022

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant

  12. 28-Jan-2022

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna

  13. 21-Jan-2022

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi

  14. 13-Dec-2021

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.S. Bopanna

  15. 22-Nov-2021

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.S. Bopanna

  16. 08-Nov-2021

    Freshly Filed Adjourned

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.S. Bopanna

  17. 06-May-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 17-Apr-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 4592/2025

  19. [ 2025 INSC 480 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: C.A. No. 4590/2025

PDF 1PDF 2PDF 3PDF 4PDF 5PDF 6PDF 7PDF 8PDF 9PDF 10PDF 11PDF 12PDF 13PDF 14PDF 15PDF 16PDF 17PDF 18PDF 19
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY C.A. No. 4592/2025 (NAILA FATMI v. STATE OF U.P.) The Supreme Court granted special leave and disposed of grouped appeals challenging illegal demolitions of residential structures by the Prayagraj Development Authority (PDA). The Court found the demolitions violated procedural safeguards under Section 27 of the U.P. Urban Planning Act, 1973, because notices were improperly served and the 15-day appeal period was not provided. The Court set aside the High Court's order, directed the PDA to follow strict notice-service directions in future demolitions, and imposed Rs. 10,00,000 costs in each case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case