DHARAM SINGH & ORS. ETC. ETC. vs THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR AND ORS ETC — C.A. No. 1677 - 1691/2017

Status: DISPOSED.

CNR: SCIN010105982016

DISPOSED

Filing Date

28-03-2016 12:00 AM

Registration No

C.A. No. 1677 - 1691/2017

Diary Number

10598/2016

Order Date

21-02-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Petitioner(s)

DHARAM SINGH & ORS. ETC. ETC.

Respondent(s)

THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR AND ORS ETC

Orders in this case

03-02-2017 ROP
03-02-2017 Office Report
03-02-2017 ROP
30-01-2017 ROP
30-01-2017 Office Report
30-01-2017 ROP
24-01-2017 ROP
24-01-2017 ROP
20-01-2017 ROP
20-01-2017 Office Report
20-01-2017 ROP
06-01-2017 ROP
06-01-2017 Office Report
06-01-2017 ROP
04-01-2017 ROP
04-01-2017 Office Report
04-01-2017 ROP
16-12-2016 ROP
16-12-2016 ROP
06-12-2016 ROP
06-12-2016 ROP
22-11-2016 Office Report
18-11-2016 ROP
18-11-2016 ROP
11-11-2016 ROP
11-11-2016 ROP
28-10-2016 ROP
28-10-2016 Office Report
28-10-2016 ROP
24-10-2016 ROP
24-10-2016 Office Report
24-10-2016 ROP
17-10-2016 ROP
17-10-2016 Office Report
17-10-2016 Office Report
17-10-2016 ROP
03-10-2016 ROP
03-10-2016 Office Report
03-10-2016 ROP
27-09-2016 ROP
27-09-2016 Office Report
27-09-2016 ROP
23-09-2016 ROP
23-09-2016 ROP
23-09-2016 Office Report
23-09-2016 Office Report
23-09-2016 Office Report
23-09-2016 ROP
23-09-2016 ROP
09-09-2016 ROP
09-09-2016 Office Report
09-09-2016 ROP
09-08-2016 ROP
09-08-2016 Office Report
09-08-2016 Office Report
09-08-2016 ROP
01-08-2016 ROP
01-08-2016 Office Report
01-08-2016 Office Report
01-08-2016 ROP
11-07-2016 ROP
11-07-2016 ROP
11-07-2016 Office Report
11-07-2016 Office Report
11-07-2016 ROP
04-07-2016 ROP
04-07-2016 Office Report
04-07-2016 Office Report
04-07-2016 ROP
29-06-2016 ROP
29-06-2016 Office Report
29-06-2016 Office Report
29-06-2016 Office Report
29-06-2016 ROP
09-05-2016 ROP
09-05-2016 Office Report
09-05-2016 Office Report
09-05-2016 ROP
02-05-2016 ROP
02-05-2016 Office Report
02-05-2016 Office Report
02-05-2016 ROP
06-04-2016 ROP
06-04-2016 Office Report
06-04-2016 ROP
04-04-2016 ROP
04-04-2016 Office Report
04-04-2016 ROP
01-04-2016 ROP
01-04-2016 Office Report
01-04-2016 Office Report
01-04-2016 ROP
08-03-2016 ROP
08-03-2016 Office Report
08-03-2016 ROP
26-02-2016 ROP
26-02-2016 Office Report
26-02-2016 ROP
16-02-2016 ROP
16-02-2016 Office Report
16-02-2016 ROP
15-02-2016 ROP
15-02-2016 Office Report
15-02-2016 Office Report
15-02-2016 ROP
08-02-2016 ROP
08-02-2016 Office Report
08-02-2016 ROP
27-01-2016 ROP
27-01-2016 Office Report
27-01-2016 ROP
18-01-2016 ROP
18-01-2016 Office Report
18-01-2016 ROP
14-01-2016 Office Report
09-12-2015 ROP
09-12-2015 ROP
23-09-2015 ROP
23-09-2015 Office Report
23-09-2015 Office Report
23-09-2015 ROP
13-07-2015 ROP
13-07-2015 Office Report
13-07-2015 ROP
13-04-2015 ROP
13-04-2015 Office Report
13-04-2015 ROP
23-03-2015 ROP
19-01-2015 ROP
19-01-2015 ROP
01-12-2014 ROP
01-12-2014 ROP
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: DHARAM SINGH & ORS. v. THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR AND ORS (C.A. No. 001677-001691/2017) Outcome The Supreme Court allowed multiple consolidated civil appeals challenging the High Court's October 6, 2015 judgment. The Court held that post-acquisition allottees of land (including Maruti Suzuki India Limited) have no locus standi and are neither necessary nor proper parties in land acquisition compensation determination proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Key Rulings - Post-acquisition allottees cannot participate in compensation determination proceedings merely because they must pay enhanced compensation - The High Court's decision to impleaded MSIL as a party was set aside - Permission to adduce additional evidence at the appellate stage was found to be without merit under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC - Compensation continues to be determined between land owners and the acquiring authority (Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation) Next Steps The matter was remanded to the High Court for fresh decision in accordance with law, with parties directed to appear on March 27, 2017. The compensation already paid to land owners would be subject to final orders of this Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Supreme Court of India All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case