VEERAMMA vs K.R. SANATHKUMAR . — C.A. No. 2590/2001

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010104432000

Filing Date

10-Jul-2000

Registration No

C.A. No. 2590/2001

Diary Number

10443/2000

Order Date

21-Jan-2009

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VEERAMMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.K.R. SANATHKUMAR .

    Adv. S. N. BHAT (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 20-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 03-Apr-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 10-Jul-2000

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 2590/2001

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: VEERAMMA v. K.R. SANATHKUMAR Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 2590 of 2001 | Decided: January 21, 2009 The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant Veeramma's appeal and upheld the High Court's judgment allowing a partition suit. The original plaintiff K.R. Sanath Kumar sought partition of ancestral joint family property, claiming a 1/6th share. The trial court rejected his claim, finding an oral partition had occurred in 1958, but the High Court set aside this finding as unsustainable due to lack of documentary evidence or property demarcation. The Supreme Court agreed with the High Court, holding that absent written documentation and formal demarcation, no valid partition occurred. The Court found the plaintiff entitled to partition as claimed, with the trial court's conclusions untenable in law. Each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case