S.U. SUMAN . vs S.M. UDAYASHANKAR . — C.A. No. 6418/2002
Case under Section XII-B. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010104412001
Filing Date
07-07-2001 04:21 AM
Registration No
C.A. No. 6418/2002
Diary Number
10441/2001
Order Date
30-09-2002
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.U. SUMAN .
Adv. A. S. BHASME (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
S.M. UDAYASHANKAR .
Adv. S. N. BHAT (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Orders
Case Summary: C.A. No. 006418/2002 S.U. Suman v. S.M. Udayashankar (Supreme Court, September 30, 2002) The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the trial court's rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11, CPC. The Court found the appellants could not furnish appropriate court fees due to ambiguity in suit valuation, falling within the Rule 11 proviso. The matter was remitted to the trial court to redetermine suit valuation within 8 weeks, with appellants given 4 weeks to pay any shortfall in court fees. If fees are paid, the trial court shall proceed on merits; if not, the plaint stands rejected. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts