THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 vs GANESH HOUSING CORPORATION LTD. — C.A. No. 14790/2025

Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010103872021

Filing Date

15-Apr-2021

Registration No

C.A. No. 14790/2025

Diary Number

10387/2021

Order Date

05-Dec-2025

Document Type

ROP

Last updated 22-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GANESH HOUSING CORPORATION LTD.

Case History

  1. 15-Apr-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 14790/2025

  2. 29-Jul-2015
  3. 29-Jul-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  4. 29-Jul-2015
  5. 17-Sep-2014
  6. 17-Sep-2014
  7. 03-Sep-2013
  8. 10-May-2013
  9. 11-Jan-2013
  10. 17-Feb-2012
  11. 07-Dec-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 31-Oct-2011
  13. 10-Oct-2011
  14. 09-Sep-2011
  15. 12-Aug-2011
  16. 11-Jul-2011
  17. 28-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 02-Dec-2010
  19. 18-Oct-2010
  20. 10-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 19-Apr-2010
  22. 16-Nov-2009
  23. 09-Nov-2009
  24. 04-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 26-Oct-2009
  26. 18-Sep-2009
  27. 25-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 09-Jan-2009
  29. 19-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 27-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 22-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 01-May-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 10-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 10-Dec-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 30-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 07-Mar-2007
  37. 07-Mar-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 19-Feb-2007

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: C.A. No. 5782/2008

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In the Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) petition filed by Industrial Cables (India) Limited against the Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala, the Supreme Court heard the matter on 19/02/2007 before Justice Ashok Bhan and Justice V.S. Sirpurkar. The petitioner's counsel sought an adjournment citing personal difficulties, which the Court granted. The case was adjourned for two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case