THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE vs CHANDU — Crl.A. No. 1038 - 1039/2017

Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010103482012

Filing Date

26-Mar-2012

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1038 - 1039/2017

Diary Number

10348/2012

Order Date

06-Jul-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHANDU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-May-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 01-May-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 01-May-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 15-Mar-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 15-Mar-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 08-Sep-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 08-Sep-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 04-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 05-May-2014
  11. 04-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 31-Mar-2014
  13. 03-Mar-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  14. 03-Mar-2014
  15. 05-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 07-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 03-Jan-2014
  18. 25-Nov-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 17-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 04-Oct-2013
  21. 05-Mar-2013
  22. 14-Feb-2013
  23. 02-Jan-2013
  24. 30-Oct-2012
  25. 14-Sep-2012
  26. 31-Jul-2012
  27. 02-Jul-2012
  28. 10-May-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 10-May-2012
  30. 26-Mar-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1038 - 1039/2017

  31. 02-Mar-2012
  32. 10-Feb-2012
  33. 05-Jan-2012
  34. 05-Jan-2012

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: Crl.A. No. 1032/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary On 01/05/2017, the Supreme Court of India heard multiple consolidated Special Leave to Appeal petitions filed by the State of Madhya Pradesh against Chandu and others, arising from a High Court order dated 29/06/2011. After hearing counsel for both parties, the Court ordered to post the matter after the ensuing summer vacation, deferring substantive judgment pending resumption of hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case