MUNICIPAL CORPORATION CHANDIGARH . vs SUMER SINGH DHILLON . — C.A. No. 1343/2006

Case under Section IV. Status: DISPOSED.

CNR: SCIN010103482001

DISPOSED

Filing Date

06-Jul-2001

Registration No

C.A. No. 1343/2006

Diary Number

10348/2001

Order Date

30-Apr-2007

Document Type

ROP

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Data as of 22-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION CHANDIGARH .

Adv. KAMINI JAISWAL

Respondent(s)

SUMER SINGH DHILLON .

Adv. NARESH BAKSHI

Orders

30-Apr-2007 ROP
09-Apr-2007 ROP
28-Feb-2006 Judgment - of Main Case
28-Feb-2006 Judgment - of Main Case
31-Jan-2006 ROP - of Main Case
10-Jan-2006 ROP - of Main Case
25-Oct-2005 ROP - of Main Case
22-Jul-2005 ROP - of Main Case
12-Apr-2005 ROP - of Main Case
11-Apr-2005 ROP - of Main Case
18-Feb-2005 ROP - of Main Case
13-Sep-2004 ROP
23-Aug-2004 ROP
12-Jul-2004 ROP
08-Apr-2004 ROP - of Main Case
01-Aug-2003 ROP
06-May-2003 ROP
14-Apr-2003 ROP
07-Apr-2003 ROP
24-Mar-2003 ROP
17-Feb-2003 ROP
11-Feb-2003 ROP
20-Jan-2003 ROP
16-Dec-2002 ROP
05-Dec-2002 ROP
22-Nov-2002 ROP
07-Oct-2002 ROP
27-Sep-2002 ROP
20-Sep-2002 ROP
16-Aug-2002 ROP
25-Feb-2002 ROP - of Main Case
14-Sep-2001 ROP
01-Jan-1970 ROP
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

The Supreme Court heard an interlocutory application (I.A. No.3) in Civil Appeal No.1353 of 2006 on April 30, 2007. The Court found that Special Leave Petition (C) No.23737 of 2002 was inadvertently omitted from the final paragraph of the judgment at Page 37, and accordingly substituted that paragraph to include it along with other related petitions. The substituted paragraph directed the High Court to examine the grievance regarding sewerage lines passing through allottees' buildings in Chandigarh, which prevented possession handover until removal. The interlocutory application was disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Supreme Court of India All courts →

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case