KIRANBALA PATHAK vs HATA SAHAKARI VIPNAN SAMITI AVAM PRAKRIYA IKAI MARDIT MANAGER — C.A. No. 3001 - 3002/2011

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010102872009

Filing Date

06-Apr-2009

Registration No

C.A. No. 3001 - 3002/2011

Diary Number

10287/2009

Order Date

28-Aug-2019

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KIRANBALA PATHAK

    Adv. H. K. CHATURVEDI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HATA SAHAKARI VIPNAN SAMITI AVAM PRAKRIYA IKAI MARDIT MANAGER

    Adv. MISHRA SAURABH (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-4]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Aug-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 28-Aug-2019

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indira Banerjee

  4. 27-Aug-2019

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indira Banerjee

  5. 22-Aug-2019

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indira Banerjee

  6. 20-Aug-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 04-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 07-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 06-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 01-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 30-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 30-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 18-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 03-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 01-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 06-Apr-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3001 - 3002/2011

casestatus.in Summary

On August 28, 2019, the Supreme Court disposed of Civil Appeals Nos. 3001-3002 of 2011 filed by Kiranbala Pathak against Hata Sahakari Vipnan Samiti Avam Prakriya Ikai Mardit. The appellant did not appear for the hearing. The court found that the appeals had become infructuous by passage of time given the peculiar facts and circumstances, and dismissed them accordingly. All pending applications were also disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case