DY.COMMR.OF I.T vs MARUTI FINANCE — C.A. No. 3977/2014
Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010102542012
Filing Date
24-Mar-2012
Registration No
C.A. No. 3977/2014
Diary Number
10254/2012
Order Date
12-Mar-2014
Document Type
Judgment - of Main Case
Last updated 19-Mar-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DY.COMMR.OF I.T
Respondent(s)
-
1.MARUTI FINANCE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2014
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Mar-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Mar-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Dec-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Nov-2013
ROPView PDF
-
25-Sep-2013
ROPView PDF
-
23-Sep-2013
ROPView PDF
-
21-Aug-2013
ROPView PDF
-
24-Jul-2013
ROPView PDF
-
18-Jul-2013
ROPView PDF
-
10-May-2013
ROPView PDF
-
16-Apr-2013
ROPView PDF
-
11-Apr-2013
ROPView PDF
-
18-Mar-2013
ROPView PDF
-
13-Mar-2013
ROPView PDF
-
05-Feb-2013
ROPView PDF
-
01-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Nov-2012
ROPView PDF
-
07-Nov-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Nov-2012
ROPView PDF
-
28-Sep-2012
ROPView PDF
-
08-Aug-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
13-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
05-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
11-May-2012
ROPView PDF
-
08-May-2012
ROPView PDF
-
08-May-2012
ROPView PDF
-
08-May-2012
ROPView PDF
-
30-Apr-2012
ROPView PDF
-
13-Apr-2012
ROPView PDF
-
04-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Apr-2012
ROPView PDF
-
30-Mar-2012
ROPView PDF
-
24-Mar-2012
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 3977/2014
-
19-Mar-2012
ROPView PDF
-
24-Feb-2012
ROPView PDF
-
15-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Feb-2012
ROPView PDF
-
06-Feb-2012
ROPView PDF
-
08-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
08-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
25-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
11-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Summary of C.A. No. 003977/2014 The Supreme Court held that under Income Tax Act Section 158BD, an assessing officer may record satisfaction that undisclosed income belongs to a person other than the searched person at three permissible stages: (a) when initiating proceedings under Section 158BC, (b) during assessment proceedings, or (c) immediately after completion of proceedings. The Court rejected the lower courts' interpretation requiring satisfaction to be recorded before completion of the searched person's assessment, finding the statute's language unambiguous and affording flexibility to assessing officers. Cases were remanded to High Courts for fresh consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts