DY.COMMR.OF I.T vs MARUTI FINANCE — C.A. No. 3977/2014

Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010102542012

Filing Date

24-Mar-2012

Registration No

C.A. No. 3977/2014

Diary Number

10254/2012

Order Date

12-Mar-2014

Document Type

Judgment - of Main Case

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DY.COMMR.OF I.T

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MARUTI FINANCE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2014

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 12-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 06-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 25-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 13-Dec-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 13-Nov-2013
  8. 25-Sep-2013
  9. 23-Sep-2013
  10. 21-Aug-2013
  11. 24-Jul-2013
  12. 18-Jul-2013
  13. 10-May-2013
  14. 16-Apr-2013
  15. 11-Apr-2013
  16. 18-Mar-2013
  17. 13-Mar-2013
  18. 05-Feb-2013
  19. 01-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 02-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 23-Nov-2012
  22. 07-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 07-Nov-2012
  24. 28-Sep-2012
  25. 08-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 16-Jul-2012
  27. 13-Jul-2012
  28. 05-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 04-Jul-2012
  30. 11-May-2012
  31. 08-May-2012
  32. 08-May-2012
  33. 08-May-2012
  34. 30-Apr-2012
  35. 13-Apr-2012
  36. 04-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  37. 02-Apr-2012
  38. 30-Mar-2012
  39. 24-Mar-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3977/2014

  40. 19-Mar-2012
  41. 24-Feb-2012
  42. 15-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  43. 06-Feb-2012
  44. 06-Feb-2012
  45. 08-Jul-2011
  46. 08-Jul-2011
  47. 25-Apr-2011
  48. 11-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  49. 28-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  50. 28-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 003977/2014 The Supreme Court held that under Income Tax Act Section 158BD, an assessing officer may record satisfaction that undisclosed income belongs to a person other than the searched person at three permissible stages: (a) when initiating proceedings under Section 158BC, (b) during assessment proceedings, or (c) immediately after completion of proceedings. The Court rejected the lower courts' interpretation requiring satisfaction to be recorded before completion of the searched person's assessment, finding the statute's language unambiguous and affording flexibility to assessing officers. Cases were remanded to High Courts for fresh consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case