M/S BYRAMJEE JEEJEEBHOY PVT. LTD. vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI — C.A. No. 9705/2024

Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010101662019

Filing Date

15-Mar-2019

Registration No

C.A. No. 9705/2024

Diary Number

10166/2019

Order Date

13-Sep-2024

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S BYRAMJEE JEEJEEBHOY PVT. LTD.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Apr-2019

    ROPView PDF

  3. 15-Mar-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 9705/2024

  4. [ 2024 INSC 692 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: C.A. No. 9702/2024

PDF 1PDF 2PDF 3PDF 4PDF 5PDF 6PDF 7PDF 8PDF 9PDF 10PDF 11PDF 12PDF 13PDF 14PDF 15PDF 16PDF 17PDF 18PDF 19
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: C.A. No. 009705/2024 (Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Pvt. Ltd. v. MCGM) Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed appeals by writ petitioners who had surrendered reserved land and constructed amenities (development plan roads) at their own cost. The Court set aside dismissals based on delay and laches, holding that such delays do not bar compensation claims in land acquisition matters. The Mumbai Municipal Corporation is directed to grant additional FSI/TDR to applicants within three months based on the Godrej & Boyce I precedent. Key Holding: Delay and laches cannot be invoked to deny compensation (in FSI/TDR form) for amenities developed on surrendered land, as compensation rights constitute vested constitutional rights under Article 300-A. The Court rejected the Corporation's argument that the 2016 regulation amendment had retrospective effect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case