KANDLA PORT TRUST vs GOODRICH MARITIME PVT.LTD. . — C.A. No. 4957/2010
Case under Section III-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010100542007
Filing Date
04-Apr-2007
Registration No
C.A. No. 4957/2010
Diary Number
10054/2007
Order Date
02-Dec-2011
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 25-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KANDLA PORT TRUST
Adv. PAREKH & CO.
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOODRICH MARITIME PVT.LTD. .
Adv. ASHWANI KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Dec-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jul-2010
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-May-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Oct-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jan-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Dec-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Nov-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Oct-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-May-2007
ROPView PDF
-
27-Apr-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2007
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 4957/2010
The Supreme Court heard Civil Appeals 4905 and 4957 of 2010 between Kandla Port Trust (appellant) and Goodrich Maritime Pvt. Ltd. (respondent) on December 2, 2011. The court issued a corrective order addressing an administrative error: a previous judgment dated 06.07.2010 incorrectly referenced "Civil Appeal No. 4951 of 2010," which was corrected to read "Civil Appeal No. 4957 of 2010" as per the D.E.U.(III) Branch's original numbering, with the court noting the D.E.U. Branch bore responsibility for the mistake rather than the Court Masters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts