ASHOK vs STATE OF HARYANA — C.A. No. 3032/2014

Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010100412010

Filing Date

29-Mar-2010

Registration No

C.A. No. 3032/2014

Diary Number

10041/2010

Order Date

18-Nov-2013

Document Type

ROP

Last updated 07-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Nov-2013
  3. 05-Sep-2013
  4. 27-Aug-2013
  5. 27-Aug-2013
  6. 12-Jul-2013
  7. 23-Apr-2013
  8. 26-Feb-2013
  9. 19-Oct-2012
  10. 17-Oct-2012
  11. 06-Sep-2012
  12. 01-May-2012
  13. 27-Mar-2012
  14. 27-Mar-2012
  15. 08-Feb-2012
  16. 20-Jan-2012
  17. 09-Jan-2012
  18. 02-Jan-2012
  19. 09-Dec-2011
  20. 18-Nov-2011
  21. 16-Nov-2011
  22. 14-Oct-2011
  23. 28-Sep-2011
  24. 26-Aug-2011
  25. 23-Aug-2011
  26. 26-Jul-2011
  27. 20-Jul-2011
  28. 20-Jul-2011
  29. 19-Jul-2011
  30. 13-May-2011
  31. 13-May-2011
  32. 29-Apr-2011
  33. 27-Apr-2011
  34. 26-Apr-2011
  35. 19-Apr-2011
  36. 08-Apr-2011
  37. 09-Mar-2011
  38. 04-Mar-2011
  39. 03-Mar-2011
  40. 22-Feb-2011
  41. 14-Feb-2011
  42. 07-Feb-2011
  43. 04-Feb-2011
  44. 25-Jan-2011
  45. 25-Jan-2011
  46. 21-Jan-2011
  47. 12-Jan-2011
  48. 10-Dec-2010
  49. 09-Dec-2010
  50. 06-Dec-2010
  51. 27-Oct-2010
  52. 27-Oct-2010
  53. 24-Sep-2010
  54. 24-Sep-2010
  55. 07-Sep-2010
  56. 16-Aug-2010
  57. 06-Aug-2010
  58. 30-Jul-2010
  59. 28-Jul-2010
  60. 16-Jul-2010
  61. 06-Jul-2010
  62. 14-May-2010
  63. 13-May-2010
  64. 26-Apr-2010
  65. 16-Apr-2010
  66. 15-Apr-2010
  67. 05-Apr-2010
  68. 29-Mar-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3032/2014

  69. 29-Mar-2010
  70. 26-Mar-2010
  71. 16-Mar-2010
  72. 15-Mar-2010
  73. 09-Mar-2010
  74. 25-Feb-2010
  75. 16-Feb-2010
  76. 08-Feb-2010
  77. 01-Feb-2010
  78. 22-Jan-2010
  79. 18-Jan-2010
  80. 15-Jan-2010
  81. 05-Jan-2010
  82. 17-Dec-2009
  83. 15-Dec-2009
  84. 14-Dec-2009
  85. 07-Dec-2009
  86. 27-Nov-2009
  87. 10-Nov-2009
  88. 06-Nov-2009
  89. 26-Oct-2009
  90. 26-Oct-2009
  91. 20-Oct-2009
  92. 29-Sep-2009
  93. 14-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  94. 11-Sep-2009
  95. 07-Sep-2009
  96. 07-Sep-2009
  97. 04-Sep-2009
  98. 04-Sep-2009
  99. 03-Sep-2009
  100. 31-Aug-2009
  101. 31-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  102. 21-Aug-2009
  103. 17-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  104. 04-Aug-2009
  105. 04-Aug-2009
  106. 31-Jul-2009
  107. 31-Jul-2009
  108. 28-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  109. 14-Jul-2009
  110. 10-Jul-2009
  111. 08-Jul-2009
  112. 15-May-2009
  113. 08-May-2009
  114. 29-Apr-2009
  115. 24-Apr-2009
  116. 17-Apr-2009
  117. 02-Apr-2009
  118. 17-Mar-2009
  119. 16-Feb-2009
  120. 16-Feb-2009
  121. 06-Feb-2009
  122. 27-Jan-2009
  123. 05-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  124. 05-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  125. 16-Dec-2008
casestatus.in Summary

The Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing the SLP by Shiv Kumar against the State of Haryana. The Court issued notice to the respondents to show cause why the compensation rate should not be enhanced to Rs. 250/- per unit, in light of the Award dated 17th November, 1994 referenced in the SLP paper book. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case