M/S AURO TEXTILE vs COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.CHANDIGARH — C.A. No. 4612/2010

Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010100372010

Filing Date

29-Mar-2010

Registration No

C.A. No. 4612/2010

Diary Number

10037/2010

Order Date

04-Mar-2016

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 07-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S AURO TEXTILE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.CHANDIGARH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Mar-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 04-Mar-2016

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 04-Mar-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 10-Dec-2014
  6. 10-Dec-2014
  7. 27-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 12-Jul-2013
  9. 16-Apr-2013
  10. 07-Nov-2012
  11. 14-Sep-2012
  12. 10-Sep-2012
  13. 06-Sep-2012
  14. 09-Aug-2012
  15. 31-Jul-2012
  16. 19-Jul-2012
  17. 16-Jul-2012
  18. 16-Jul-2012
  19. 04-Jul-2012
  20. 04-May-2012
  21. 04-May-2012
  22. 25-Apr-2012
  23. 16-Apr-2012
  24. 16-Apr-2012
  25. 16-Apr-2012
  26. 30-Aug-2010
  27. 16-Jul-2010
  28. 29-Mar-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 4612/2010

  29. 04-Mar-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 004612/2010 This case, consolidated with multiple appeals concerning knitted garment manufacturers, addressed whether exemption benefits under Central Excise Notifications 14/02-CE and 15/02-CE applied when manufacturers didn't produce documents proving duty payment on input fabrics. The Supreme Court ruled that Explanation II to these notifications creates a legal fiction deeming textile yarns and fabrics "duty paid" even without documentary proof, making exemption available to manufacturers who don't claim CENVAT credit. Assessees' appeals were allowed; Revenue appeals dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case