COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER vs M/S. RAJASTHAN TRADE AGENTS DIRECTOR — C.A. No. 4438 - 4439/2013

Case under Indirect Taxation : Value Added Tax (Vat), State Sales Tax Act Section XV. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010100252013

Filing Date

22-Mar-2013

Registration No

C.A. No. 4438 - 4439/2013

Diary Number

10025/2013

Order Date

02-May-2022

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Indirect Taxation : Value Added Tax (VAT), State Sales Tax Act Section XV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER

    Adv. IRSHAD AHMAD[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S. RAJASTHAN TRADE AGENTS DIRECTOR

    Adv. VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA[R-1]

Case History

  1. 05-Oct-2023

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar

  2. 05-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 05-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 05-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 05-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 19-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 27-Jan-2014

    ROPView PDF

  8. 03-May-2013

    ROPView PDF

  9. 22-Mar-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 4438 - 4439/2013

  10. 07-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 07-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 17-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 25-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 09-May-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: C.A. No. 1124 - 1125/2013

PDF 1PDF 2PDF 3PDF 4PDF 5PDF 6PDF 7PDF 8PDF 9PDF 10PDF 11PDF 12PDF 13
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Supreme Court heard Durgeshwari Foods Ltd.'s Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) Nos. 14699-14700/2012 against a Rajasthan High Court judgment in a commercial tax evasion matter on May 9, 2012. The Court allowed the petitioner's application for exemption from filing an Official Translation and issued notice to the respondent (Commercial Tax Officer, Anti Evasion). No substantive order on the merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case