CHHOTANAGPUR ROPE WORKS vs STATE OF BIHAR . — C.A. No. 2396 - 2397/2002
Case under Section XVI. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010098491995
Filing Date
18-Mar-2002
Registration No
C.A. No. 2396 - 2397/2002
Diary Number
9849/1995
Order Date
20-Jul-2010
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHHOTANAGPUR ROPE WORKS
Adv. SHARMILA UPADHYAY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR .
Adv. SUNIL ROY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Mar-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Mar-2002
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 2396 - 2397/2002
Summary: The Supreme Court allowed Chhotanagpur Rope Works' appeals against the High Court's Division Bench judgment dated 17.02.1995. The central issue was whether jute rope/jute core rope qualifies as "agricultural produce" under the Bihar Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1960. The Court held that commodities must be listed in the Act's Schedule to be classified as agricultural produce; since jute rope is not in the Schedule (only raw jute, gunny bags, and sutli are mentioned), it cannot be deemed agricultural produce. The Court set aside the Division Bench judgment and restored the single Judge's decision, allowing the appeals without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts