THE STATE OF HARYANA HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY HOME vs HUKAM CHAND — SLP(Crl) No. 6589 - 6590/2013

Case under Section II-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010098102012

Filing Date

21-Mar-2012

Registration No

SLP(Crl) No. 6589 - 6590/2013

Diary Number

9810/2012

Order Date

22-Nov-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HARYANA HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY HOME

    Adv. NARESH BAKSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HUKAM CHAND

    Adv. YASH PAL DHINGRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Nov-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 22-Nov-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer

  4. 21-Nov-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 21-Nov-2017

    Administrative Order

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer

  6. 18-Sep-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 18-Sep-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 13-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 13-Jul-2015
  10. 13-Jul-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  11. 13-Jul-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 13-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 13-Jul-2015
  14. 17-Dec-2014
  15. 09-Oct-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 30-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 04-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 02-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 09-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 08-May-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 21-Mar-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(Crl) No. 6589 - 6590/2013

  22. 21-Nov-2011
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(Crl) 6589-6590/2013 On 22-11-2017, the Supreme Court (Justice N.V. Ramana and Justice S. Abdul Nazeer) heard the State of Haryana's special leave petitions challenging the High Court of Punjab & Haryana's orders dated 20-04-2011. The Court dismissed both petitions on grounds of delay as well as on merits, finding no reason to interfere with the impugned High Court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case