RACHHPAL KAUR vs STATE OF PUNJAB HOME SECRETARY — Crl.A. No. 2218/2009
Case under Section II-B. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010097732009
Filing Date
01-Apr-2009
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 2218/2009
Diary Number
9773/2009
Order Date
18-Sep-2019
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Appeals Allowed
Data as of 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RACHHPAL KAUR
Adv. SATYAPAL KHUSHAL CHAND PASI (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-1]
Respondent(s)
STATE OF PUNJAB HOME SECRETARY
Adv. JASPREET GOGIA[R-1] JASPREET GOGIA[R-1] P. N. PURI[COMP]
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE
After Week/Month/Vacation
After Week/Month/Vacation
After Week/Month/Vacation
After Week/Month/Vacation
Ordinary
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-Sep-2019 | After Week/Month/Vacation |
| 17-Sep-2019 | After Week/Month/Vacation |
| 12-Sep-2019 | After Week/Month/Vacation |
| 03-Sep-2019 | After Week/Month/Vacation |
| 14-Aug-2019 | Ordinary |
Orders
Case Summary: Rachhpal Kaur v. State of Punjab (Crl.A. No. 2218/2009) Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed the appeal on September 18, 2019, setting aside the conviction of Rachhpal Kaur and her son-in-law under Section 302/34 IPC (murder). The court found the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case based on circumstantial evidence alone. Medical evidence was inconclusive—equally suggesting suicide or strangulation—warranting benefit of doubt to the accused. The court rejected the High Court's premature burden shift under Section 106 IEA and found the trial court improperly dismissed the appellants' defense of false implication due to property disputes with the deceased's brothers. Next Steps: Bail bonds discharged; appellants freed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts