MANIKCHAND AND ORS. vs SAKARCHAND S/O PREMCHAND GUJRATHI AND ORS. — C.A. No. 5060/2008
Case under 3801-Public Trust, Religious Endowments, Waqfs : Management, Administration of Temples, Waqfs and Other Religious Institutions, Including Appointment/ Removal of Trustees, Executive Officers, Members of Waqfs Boards,<br> Public Trust, Religious Endowments, Waqfs : Management, Administration of Temples, Waqfs and Other Religious Institutions, Including Appointment/ Removal of Trustees, Executive Officers, Members of Waqfs Boards Section III. Status: PENDING.
CNR: SCIN010096582007
Filing Date
02-Apr-2007
Registration No
C.A. No. 5060/2008
Diary Number
9658/2007
Order Date
05-Apr-2023
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Data as of 25-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANIKCHAND AND ORS.
Adv. SHUVODEEP ROY[P-1]
Respondent(s)
SAKARCHAND S/O PREMCHAND GUJRATHI AND ORS.
Adv. SUMITA RAY[R-2] HARSH V. SURANA[R-4] HARSH V. SURANA[R-1] HARSH V. SURANA[R-5] HARSH V. SURANA[R-6] SUMITA RAY[R-3]
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI
Mention Memo
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-Apr-2023 | Mention Memo |
| 22-Feb-2023 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 16-Feb-2023 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 15-Feb-2023 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 08-Feb-2023 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
Orders
Case Summary: Manikchand v. Sakarchand (CA 5060/2008) In this interim application heard on 05-04-2023, the Supreme Court rejected the appellants' challenge to a prior order permitting the Shwetambari sect to apply plaster (lep) on an idol. The Court clarified that maintenance plaster to prevent wear and tear does not alter the idol's nature or status, dismissing the applicants' concerns as misconceived. The Court directed that the Shwetambari sect may continue completing the plaster application and authorized repair of damaged portions under District Administration supervision. The interim application was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts