STATE OF M.P. . vs SUNIL KUMAR JYOTSHI — C.A. No. 7624/2009

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010096102006

Filing Date

12-Apr-2006

Registration No

C.A. No. 7624/2009

Diary Number

9610/2006

Order Date

10-Oct-2012

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF M.P. .

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUNIL KUMAR JYOTSHI

    Adv. B. K. SATIJA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 09-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 26-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 28-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 12-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 12-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 29-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 19-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 06-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 05-Oct-2009
  12. 03-Aug-2009
  13. 19-Aug-2008
  14. 02-May-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 23-Mar-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 09-Feb-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 16-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 20-Sep-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 24-Jul-2006
  20. 05-Jul-2006
  21. 12-Apr-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 7624/2009

  22. 27-Feb-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 04-Jan-2006
  24. 09-Dec-2005
  25. 09-Dec-2005
  26. 28-Oct-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 03-Dec-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 19-Nov-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

The Supreme Court dismissed Civil Appeal No. 7624/2009 and 17 related appeals filed by the State of M.P. on October 10, 2012. The High Court had directed the State to enforce its 1995 absorption scheme strictly according to its own prescribed norms for eligibility, pay protection, and supernumerary post creation. The Court found no merit in the appeals and upheld the High Court's judgment, finding no direction contrary to the State's scheme. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case