KAMAL RAMESH WAGHMERE vs MEHER ENGINEERING AND FABRICATORS — SLP(C) No. 7268/2026

Case under Labour and Industrial Laws : Payment of Wages, Bonus, Provident Fund, Gratuity, Service Benefits, Benefits Under Esic Act, 1948, Compensation Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (Now Employees Compensation Act, 1923)and Payment of Overtime Wages and Minimum Wage. Section IX. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010093162026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 7268/2026

Diary Number

9316/2026

Order Date

08-May-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Labour and Industrial Laws : Payment of wages, bonus, provident fund, gratuity, service benefits, benefits under ESIC Act, 1948, compensation under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (now Employees Compensation Act, 1923)and payment of overtime wages and minimum wage. Section IX

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAMAL RAMESH WAGHMERE

    Adv. RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MEHER ENGINEERING AND FABRICATORS

Case History

  1. 08-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  2. 08-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Augustine George Masih

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Augustine George Masih

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 7268/2026

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In the Special Leave Petition filed by Kamal Ramesh Waghmere against Meher Engineering and Fabricators (arising from a 2025 High Court judgment), the Supreme Court directed that fresh service of notice be completed by furnishing updated respondent particulars within one week, failing which the petition shall stand automatically dismissed for non-prosecution. Fresh notice, returnable on 24.07.2026, is to be issued if proper service steps are taken, with the respondent required to file a counter-affidavit before the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case