SHAM LAL BANSAL vs SURINDER PARKASH DHIR . — C.A. No. 3510/2001

Summary: The Supreme Court granted leave and disposed of the appeal by directing that the respondent must file an application under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC before the Execution Court (if not already filed) to address the appellant's resistance to execution of an eviction decree under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949. The appellant, who was not a party to the original eviction proceedings, may file a counter-application in response. Further execution proceedings will depend on the Execution Court's order under Order 21 Rule 101 CPC, with the respondent responsible for pursuing expeditious disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.