RAM DAS vs ASHARAM . — C.A. No. 6304/2014
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010092532010
Filing Date
22-Mar-2010
Registration No
C.A. No. 6304/2014
Diary Number
9253/2010
Order Date
10-Jul-2014
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAM DAS
Adv. RAJESH
Respondent(s)
-
1.ASHARAM .
Adv. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jul-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jul-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-May-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Oct-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Mar-2010
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 6304/2014
Summary of C.A. No. 006304/2014 (RAM DAS v. ASHARAM) On July 10, 2014, the Supreme Court allowed Asharam's appeal against the High Court's modification of the dismissal decree. The High Court had held certain land (Survey Nos. 153, 216, 309) as ancestral property belonging to their grandfather Chinnu, entitling Ram Das to one-third share. The Supreme Court reversed this, finding no evidence that Ram Das was born during Chinnu's lifetime, thus he cannot inherit ancestral property. The property devolved to their father Sanvale, who had authority to alienate it via the 1971 sale deed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts