COCHIN MALABAR ESTATES vs FEDERAL BANK LTD. . — C.A. No. 4843/2017
Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010092422013
Filing Date
18-Mar-2013
Registration No
C.A. No. 4843/2017
Diary Number
9242/2013
Order Date
03-May-2018
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.COCHIN MALABAR ESTATES
Adv. BRIJ BHUSHAN[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.FEDERAL BANK LTD. .
Adv. P. I. JOSE[R-1] V. SHYAMOHAN[R-1] JOHN MATHEW[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-May-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-May-2018
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi
-
28-Nov-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi
-
23-Nov-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi
-
22-Nov-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi
-
21-Nov-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi
-
19-Sep-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Sep-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
14-Sep-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
13-Sep-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
12-Sep-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
07-Sep-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
06-Sep-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
05-Sep-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
30-Aug-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Aug-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
29-Aug-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
17-Aug-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Aug-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
16-Aug-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Mar-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Mar-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Dec-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Dec-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Nov-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Nov-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Sep-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Sep-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Sep-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Sep-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Aug-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Aug-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Feb-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Feb-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Nov-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Mar-2013
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 4843/2017
Case Summary: Cochin Malabar Estates v. Federal Bank Ltd. Outcome: Supreme Court dismissed Cochin Malabar Estates' appeal and upheld the High Court's decision. The court found that the appellant was bound by its One Time Settlement (O.T.S.) agreement with Federal Bank dated February 1, 2005, which explicitly required withdrawal of all pending cases challenging the Sampaji Estate's auction sale and prohibited further legal proceedings to set aside that sale. Key Issue: The appellant challenged the auction sale of Sampaji Estate claiming non-compliance with Section 19(23) of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993. However, the court held that by accepting the O.T.S. and benefiting from it (Rs. 8.50 crores received), the appellant had already accepted the sale, making the subsequent challenge contractually impermissible and inequitable. Result: No next hearing dates mentioned; matter concluded with appeal dismissal on May 3, 2018. Joonktollee Tea and Industries Ltd. was allowed as appellant No. 2 via intervention application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts