M/S. INDIAN CHARGE CHROME LTD. . vs UNION OF INDIA . — C.A. No. 8501/2002
Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010092412001
Filing Date
29-May-2001
Registration No
C.A. No. 8501/2002
Diary Number
9241/2001
Order Date
09-Jan-2007
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S. INDIAN CHARGE CHROME LTD. .
Adv. B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA .
Adv. DEVENDRA SINGH MEHRA EJAZ MAQBOOL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Jan-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Dec-2006
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Dec-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Aug-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Aug-2006
ROPView PDF
-
28-Jul-2006
ROPView PDF
-
25-Jul-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jul-2006
ROPView PDF
-
02-May-2006
ROPView PDF
-
20-Mar-2006
ROPView PDF
-
20-Feb-2006
ROPView PDF
-
16-Jan-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Nov-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Oct-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Aug-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Aug-2005
ROPView PDF
-
27-Jul-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jul-2005
ROPView PDF
-
17-Feb-2005
ROPView PDF
-
11-Oct-2004
ROPView PDF
-
28-Sep-2004
ROPView PDF
-
08-Mar-2004
ROPView PDF
-
12-Sep-2003
ROPView PDF
-
29-Aug-2003
ROPView PDF
-
17-Dec-2002
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Dec-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Nov-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jul-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-May-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Apr-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Apr-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Feb-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jan-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Dec-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Oct-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-May-2001
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 8501/2002
On 11/12/2006, the Supreme Court bench headed by Chief Justice Y.K. Sabharwal pronounced judgment in this consolidated appeal involving mining lease matters. The Court allowed appeals by the State of Orissa and OMC entirely, and partially allowed appeals by Indian Charge Chrome Ltd. (I.C.C.L.) and GMR by setting aside the lease grant to Nava Bharat. All Transfer Petitions were allowed and transferred cases disposed of per the signed judgment, with each party bearing their own court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts