M/S APL APOLLO TUBES LTD. vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH INSTITUTIONAL FINANCE THR. ITS SECRETARY — C.A. No. 4953/2012
Case under Indirect Taxation : Entry Tax, Motor Vehicle Tax, Purchase Tax, Entertainment Tax, Terminal Tax, Octroi, Toll Tax, Professional Tax, Gold Control Act, Hotel Receipts Tax Act, Water and Sewage Tax, Luxury Tax, Cess Acts Section III-A. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010091732012
Filing Date
16-03-2012 12:00 AM
Registration No
C.A. No. 4953/2012
Diary Number
9173/2012
Order Date
18-03-2026
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S APL APOLLO TUBES LTD.
Adv. DEEPAK GOEL[P-1]
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH INSTITUTIONAL FINANCE THR. ITS SECRETARY
Adv. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1] BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-2]
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANNA B. VARALE
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 12-03-2026 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 11-03-2026 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 26-02-2026 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 25-02-2026 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
Orders
Summary: The Supreme Court dismissed 16 consolidated civil appeals filed by APL Apollo Tubes Ltd. against the State of Uttar Pradesh as infructuous on March 18, 2026. The Court also dissolved any interim orders that had been passed in the case. Separately, in C.A. No. 1581/2018, the Court directed that its pendency would not obstruct the High Court's adjudication of Writ Tax No. 757/2018 and related matters, with the case listed for further hearing on April 8, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts