ARSALAN FEROZE AHENGER vs NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY — SLP(Crl) No. 7432/2026

Case under 1507Rb-criminal Law : Prevention of Terrorism Act (Pota) and National Security Act (Nsa), Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act (Cofeposa), Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (Uapa), Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (Tada)(slps Arising Out of Regular Bail Applications, Suspension of Sentence) Section II-D. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010091722026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

SLP(Crl) No. 7432/2026

Diary Number

9172/2026

Order Date

18-May-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

1507RB-Criminal Law : Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA) and National Security Act (NSA), Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act (COFEPOSA), Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA)(SLPs arising out of Regular Bail applications, suspension of sentence) Section II-D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARSALAN FEROZE AHENGER

    Adv. A. KARTHIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY

    Adv. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 18-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 20-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(Crl) No. 7432/2026

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Supreme Court disposed of Arsalan Feroze Ahenger's Special Leave Petition against the National Investigation Agency. The Court directed the Trial Court to expedite the trial where charges have been framed and multiple witnesses remain to be examined. The petitioner is granted liberty to file a fresh bail application after one year if the trial does not proceed expeditiously, which will not be barred by the earlier order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case