THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs P. PALANISAMY . — Crl.A. No. 1389 - 1390/2017
Case under Section II-C. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010090732013
Filing Date
16-Mar-2013
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 1389 - 1390/2017
Diary Number
9073/2013
Order Date
11-Aug-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Leave Granted & Disposed off
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Adv. M. YOGESH KANNA
Respondent(s)
-
1.P. PALANISAMY .
Adv. L. K. PANDEY (Dead / Retired / Elevated) PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[R-2]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Aug-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Aug-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
-
22-Aug-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Aug-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Aug-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jan-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jan-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Sep-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Sep-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-May-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Mar-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Mar-2013
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1389 - 1390/2017
Case Summary: State of Tamil Nadu v. P. Palanisamy (Crl.A. 1389-1390/2017) The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's acquittal order, finding that evidence of illegal gratification demand existed in witness PW-2's testimony, contrary to the High Court's finding of no such evidence. The matter was remanded to the High Court for fresh consideration in accordance with law, with parties directed to appear on September 11, 2017, without the Supreme Court expressing any final opinion on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts