MAHINDRA PANDAHRI BAWISKAR vs S.T.CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY C.,GADCH.. — C.A. No. 6422 - 6423/2019
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010089692013
Filing Date
15-Mar-2013
Registration No
C.A. No. 6422 - 6423/2019
Diary Number
8969/2013
Order Date
16-Aug-2019
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Leave Granted & Allowed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHINDRA PANDAHRI BAWISKAR
Adv. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.S.T.CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY C.,GADCH..
Adv. RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Aug-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Aug-2019
Administrative Order
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose
-
06-Dec-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Dec-2018
Administrative Order
Registrar (A-J)
-
02-May-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-May-2018
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul
-
02-Apr-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Apr-2018
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer
-
10-Jan-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jan-2018
Ordinary
Registrar (J) - IV
-
15-Sep-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Sep-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (J) - IV
-
18-Aug-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Aug-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Mar-2017
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Nov-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Nov-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Aug-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Aug-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Jul-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-May-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Mar-2013
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 6422 - 6423/2019
CASE SUMMARY The Supreme Court partially allowed Mahendra Pandahri Bawiskar's appeals, holding that no criminal prosecution can be initiated against him for obtaining a fraudulent Scheduled Tribe certificate in 1989, since the Maharashtra caste certificate verification act came into force only in 2001. However, the Court rejected his main prayer to retain his job, reasoning that his fraudulent certificate had deprived an actual Scheduled Tribe member of that position. The Court affirmed the High Court's decision invalidating the caste certificate while providing limited relief by shielding him from criminal liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts