MANJU vs THE STATE OF DELHI SHO — Crl.A. No. 1268/2013
Case under Section II-D. Status: Sclsc Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010089602013
Filing Date
15-Mar-2013
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 1268/2013
Diary Number
8960/2013
Order Date
17-Dec-2019
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2019 INSC 1385
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANJU
Adv. ANJANI AIYAGARI[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF DELHI SHO (Station House Officer)
Adv. B. V. BALARAM DAS (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Dec-2019
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Dec-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Dec-2019
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy
-
04-Dec-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Dec-2019
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy
-
06-Dec-2018
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indira Banerjee
-
05-Dec-2018
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indira Banerjee
-
22-Oct-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Oct-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Jul-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jul-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Nov-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Nov-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Sep-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Sep-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jul-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Jul-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Mar-2013
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1268/2013
-
[ 2019 INSC 1385 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary: Manju v. State of Delhi Crl.A. No. 1268 of 2013 The Supreme Court acquitted Manju of murder charges, overturning her life sentence conviction. Manju was accused of strangling her newborn daughter at Lady Hardinge Medical College Hospital on August 24, 2007. The Court found the conviction based on circumstantial evidence lacked a complete chain of proof and reasonable motive. Key factors: the baby was in an incubator with oxygen immediately after birth and showed no vital signs; Manju was sedated; the family already wanted a daughter; and no direct evidence established guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The Court emphasized that without clear evidence, the accused deserved benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts