NAGARAJA vs PANJU POOJARY — SLP(C) No. 16607/2013

Case under Section IV-C. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010089062013

Filing Date

14-Mar-2013

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 16607/2013

Diary Number

8906/2013

Order Date

02-Aug-2022

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV-C

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAGARAJA

    Adv. S. N. BHAT (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PANJU POOJARY

    Adv. BALAJI SRINIVASAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Aug-2022

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 02-Aug-2022

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath

  4. 14-Feb-2020

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 14-Feb-2020

    Administrative Order

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta

  6. 25-Jan-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 25-Jan-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 12-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 12-Jan-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 12-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 09-Nov-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 09-Nov-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 24-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 24-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 14-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 17-Mar-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 17-Mar-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 21-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 01-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 26-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 14-Mar-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 16607/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 016607/2013 - Nagaraja v. Panju Poojary On 02-08-2022, the Supreme Court dismissed Nagaraja's special leave petition challenging the High Court of Karnataka's 2012 order regarding property devolution following Venkamma Pujarthy's death. The Court found the High Court's distribution of property equally among the three legal heirs (daughter Anthamma and sons Manja Billava and Joga Billava) to be fair, reasonable, and error-free. The petitioner failed to appear despite notice, and all pending applications were disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case