VIRENDRA SINGH vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH ITS SECRETARY — Crl.A. No. 1209/2014
Case under 1511Li-criminal Law : Criminal Matters Other Than Covered by the Aforesaid Categories(cases Where Life Sentence Is Imposed) Section II. Status: Pending.
CNR: SCIN010088672013
Filing Date
14-Mar-2013
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 1209/2014
Diary Number
8867/2013
Order Date
03-Nov-2025
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIRENDRA SINGH
Adv. S. R. SETIA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH ITS SECRETARY
Adv. RUCHIRA GOEL[R-1]
Case History
-
03-Nov-2025
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Nov-2025
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Joymalya Bagchi
-
25-Apr-2025
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Apr-2025
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan
-
25-Apr-2025
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan
-
21-Mar-2025
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jul-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jul-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jun-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jun-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Feb-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Feb-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Nov-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Nov-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-May-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Jan-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Mar-2013
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1209/2014
Case Summary: Crl.A. No. 1209/2014 On 03-11-2025, the Supreme Court heard Criminal Appeal No. 1209/2014 filed by Virendra Singh against the State of Uttar Pradesh before Justice Joymalya Bagchi. The appellant's counsel did not appear for hearing. The Court directed the Registry to issue notice to the standing counsel of the State and obtain a verification report regarding the death of the sole petitioner and his wife. The matter was adjourned for two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts