ABHAY SINGH (DEAD) vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH . — SLP(C) No. 25237/2010
Case under Section XI. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010088622010
Filing Date
18-Mar-2010
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 25237/2010
Diary Number
8862/2010
Order Date
27-Nov-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ABHAY SINGH (DEAD)
Adv. SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH .
Adv. ANIP SACHTHEY (Dead / Retired / Elevated) DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA PRAGATI NEEKHRA ABHISHEK ATREY SUNIL FERNANDES (Dead / Retired / Elevated) B. BALAJI (Dead / Retired / Elevated) MISHRA SAURABH (Dead / Retired / Elevated) ANURADHA MUTATKAR GUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO SHUVODEEP ROY[R-2] SHIBASHISH MISRA P. V. YOGESWARAN T. MAHIPAL GOPAL SINGH HEMANTIKA WAHI SUNIL KUMAR JAIN ARPUTHAM ARUNA AND CO ASHA GOPALAN NAIR GOPAL PRASAD V. N. RAGHUPATHY CORPORATE LAW GROUP JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA RAVI PRAKASH MEHROTRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) MERUSAGAR SAMANTARAY[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Nov-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Nov-2017
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amitava Roy
-
03-Nov-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Nov-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-May-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-May-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Sep-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Sep-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Sep-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jan-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jan-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jan-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Dec-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Dec-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Dec-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Aug-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Aug-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Aug-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jun-2014
ROPView PDF
-
14-Mar-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Mar-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Jan-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Dec-2013
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Dec-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Dec-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Dec-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Nov-2013
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Nov-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Oct-2013
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Aug-2013
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Aug-2013
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-May-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Mar-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Dec-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Aug-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-May-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Dec-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Oct-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-May-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Dec-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Mar-2010
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 25237/2010
Summary On 27-11-2017, the Supreme Court disposed of SLP(C) No. 25237/2010 and related petitions after noting that the petitioner Abhay Singh had expired and no legal representatives were substituted despite prior court orders. The Court found no point in keeping the petitions pending given intervening developments. The petitions were disposed of with liberty for parties to approach State Governments/Union Territories for appropriate orders on matters including security, outside the scope of the High Court's original order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts