DHARMENDRA KUMAR AGRAHARI vs THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH — C.A. No. 7031/2015

Case under Tenders/licenses/leases : Tenders/licenses/leases Invited by the State Governments/ Local Bodies/ State Public Sector Undertakings,including Cancellation/award of Tenders. Section IV. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010088282013

Filing Date

14-Mar-2013

Registration No

C.A. No. 7031/2015

Diary Number

8828/2013

Order Date

06-Oct-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Tenders/licenses/leases : Tenders/licenses/leases invited by the State Governments/ local bodies/ State public sector undertakings,including cancellation/award of tenders. Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHARMENDRA KUMAR AGRAHARI

    Adv. HARISH PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

    Adv. ASWATHI M.K.[R-1]

Case History

  1. 09-Oct-2025

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar

  2. 11-Sep-2025

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar

  3. 21-Aug-2025

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar

  4. 06-Oct-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 06-Oct-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Sep-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 11-Sep-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 26-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 26-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 03-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 23-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 22-Nov-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 07-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 08-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 14-Mar-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 7031/2015

casestatus.in Summary

In this Civil Appeal hearing on 06-10-2017, the Registrar noted that all respondents were duly served but neither party filed the required Statement of Case despite the deadline expiring. The court directed that the matter be listed before the Hon'ble Court for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case