MANVINDER KAUR vs HARSHARAN KAUR . — CONMT.PET.(C) No. 162 - 165/2009

Case under Section Z_NOT KNOWN. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010086572009

Filing Date

23-Mar-2009

Registration No

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 162 - 165/2009

Diary Number

8657/2009

Order Date

21-Oct-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section Z_NOT KNOWN

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANVINDER KAUR

    Adv. RAKHI RAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARSHARAN KAUR .

    Adv. PUJA SHARMA SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Oct-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 23-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 23-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 25-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 09-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 11-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 07-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 07-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 13-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 22-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 20-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 07-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 28-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 05-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 16-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 15-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 11-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 21-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 23-Mar-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. CONMT.PET.(C) No. 162 - 165/2009

casestatus.in Summary

In this family dispute involving agricultural land in Haryana, the Supreme Court enforced a 2006 mediated settlement in which petitioner Manvinder Kaur was entitled to 40% of a 7.5-acre property. The Court directed the Tehsildar of Ambala to deliver exclusive physical possession of the 40% land share to Manvinder Kaur within four weeks, rejecting the Tehsildar's earlier refusal based on partition procedures. Respondents were prohibited from obstructing the order, with police assistance authorized if necessary. The Contempt Petitions were disposed of accordingly on October 21, 2011. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case