STATE OF U.P. . vs GOBARDHAN LAL — C.A. No. 408/2004
Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010085912000
Filing Date
19-May-2000
Registration No
C.A. No. 408/2004
Diary Number
8591/2000
Order Date
23-Mar-2004
Document Type
Judgment - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. .
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOBARDHAN LAL
Adv. MUKESH K. GIRI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2004
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Mar-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Mar-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jan-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Sep-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Aug-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jul-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Apr-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Mar-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jan-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Dec-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Nov-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Sep-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Aug-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jan-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Nov-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Oct-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-May-2000
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 408/2004
SUMMARY The Supreme Court set aside the Allahabad High Court's judgment that had issued sweeping directions regarding government servant transfers. The Court held that transfer orders cannot be lightly interfered with unless shown to be mala fide or violative of statutory provisions, and that courts should not substitute their own decisions for those of competent administrative authorities. The Court emphasized that while individual grievances may be pursued through proper channels, the High Court erred in attempting to lay down general principles and policy directives that encroached upon executive authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts