STATE OF U.P. . vs GOBARDHAN LAL — C.A. No. 408/2004

Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010085912000

Filing Date

19-May-2000

Registration No

C.A. No. 408/2004

Diary Number

8591/2000

Order Date

23-Mar-2004

Document Type

Judgment - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. .

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOBARDHAN LAL

    Adv. MUKESH K. GIRI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2004

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 23-Mar-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 09-Mar-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 16-Jan-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 12-Sep-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 14-Aug-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 18-Jul-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 25-Apr-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 28-Mar-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 17-Jan-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 13-Dec-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 15-Nov-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 20-Sep-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 23-Aug-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 10-Jan-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 29-Nov-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 05-Oct-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 19-May-2000

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 408/2004

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The Supreme Court set aside the Allahabad High Court's judgment that had issued sweeping directions regarding government servant transfers. The Court held that transfer orders cannot be lightly interfered with unless shown to be mala fide or violative of statutory provisions, and that courts should not substitute their own decisions for those of competent administrative authorities. The Court emphasized that while individual grievances may be pursued through proper channels, the High Court erred in attempting to lay down general principles and policy directives that encroached upon executive authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case