BISHNUPADA DUTTA vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — Crl.A. No. 233/2013

Case under Section II-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010085682011

Filing Date

14-Mar-2011

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 233/2013

Diary Number

8568/2011

Order Date

08-Dec-2021

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BISHNUPADA DUTTA

    Adv. RANJAN MUKHERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

    Adv. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Dec-2021

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 08-Dec-2021

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh

  4. 07-Dec-2021

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 07-Dec-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 07-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 11-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 11-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 01-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 11-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 04-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 14-Dec-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 13-Dec-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 18-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 18-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 02-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 28-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 10-Oct-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 29-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 04-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 07-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 14-Mar-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 233/2013

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

The Supreme Court dismissed the criminal appeal filed by Bishnupada Dutta and another appellant against the State of West Bengal on December 8, 2021. The court noted that the appellants had already served their sentence substantially and directed that the period already undergone shall be the final sentence, even if the full sentence had not been completed. No further steps or next date were mentioned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case