SIMLESH DEVI vs <font color='red'>THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH SECRETARY, INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, LUCKNOW</font> — C.A. No. 5168/2012
Case under Land Acquisition and Requisition : Challenge to Land Acquisition, Lapsing of Acquisition, De-reservation, Requisition and De-requisition of Property and Others Section III-A. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010084812010
Filing Date
16-Mar-2010
Registration No
C.A. No. 5168/2012
Diary Number
8481/2010
Order Date
17-Jun-2026
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Data as of 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SIMLESH DEVI
Adv. SATPAL SINGH[P-1] SATPAL SINGH[P-8] SATPAL SINGH[P-7] SATPAL SINGH[P-6] SATPAL SINGH[P-5] SATPAL SINGH[P-4] SATPAL SINGH[P-3] SATPAL SINGH[P-2]
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH SECRETARY, INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, LUCKNOW
Adv. BINAY KUMAR DAS[R-3] SHASHANK SHEKHAR SINGH[R-2] SHASHANK SHEKHAR SINGH[R-4]
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE V. MOHANA
After Week/Month/Vacation
After Week/Month/Vacation
After Week/Month/Vacation
After Week/Month/Vacation
After Week/Month/Vacation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-Jun-2026 | After Week/Month/Vacation |
| 21-May-2026 | After Week/Month/Vacation |
| 20-May-2026 | After Week/Month/Vacation |
| 12-Feb-2026 | After Week/Month/Vacation |
| 05-Feb-2026 | After Week/Month/Vacation |
Orders
Summary of SIMLESH DEVI v. THE COLLECTOR (C.A. No. 5168/2012) The Supreme Court allowed the appeals in part on June 17, 2026, exempting the appellants' small residential plots (100-200 sq. yds.) from a 230-hectare land acquisition in Gautam Budh Nagar for industrial development, while upholding the overall acquisition. The Court invoked Article 142 to do complete justice, noting 16 years of court-protected possession and that development had already occurred, directing that exempted properties may apply for basic amenities but must pay prescribed development charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts